Talk:1890
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year in topic
[edit]The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page
1890 is NOT currently conforming to proposed general model paragraph "year in topi" needs deleting --BozMo 12:12, 5 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)
Format
[edit]Wounded Knee
[edit]26-December-2006: Somehow the entry for Wounded Knee was added 4 years ago (29Dec2002) claiming "400 men, women and children" were massacred by U.S. troops; the article "Wounded Knee Massacre" states only 153 Lakota Sioux AND 25 troops were killed (150 fled). Nearly 4 years later, I have fixed the "400" error from 29-Dec-2002. Beware of people or dubious sources trying to needle others by exaggerating data to their agenda. -Wikid77 12:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Alice Sanger
[edit]what does the link for Alice Sanger have to do with a book publushed in the 1950s? this should be fixed or just tell me if im wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.14.21 (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
This seems like an erroneous redirect to me. I've nominated it for discussion. 66.214.40.255 (talk) 23:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Sinking of the Duburg
[edit]A number of sources indicate that the steamship Duburg was sunk on 17 February 1890, however, this contemporary newspaper article [1] which refers to it as being missing is dated 17 January. I very much doubt that it was adrift for a month before it sank. It is likely that it was sunk before 17 January and it took some days before the newspaper report was printed. Who knows? Bazonka (talk) 07:50, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the 1890 page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "1890" page.