Jump to content

Talk:Matthew Green (British politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Removed from the article text and expanded:)


Untitled

[edit]

We need confirmation (a full set of historic election results?) of his claim to be the first "official" Liberal MP for Ludlow since 1886. Were there other Liberals in the seat? Liberal Unionists? National-Liberals? --rbrwr

He's my M.P at the moment, but don't ask me! Finding pre-1966 constituancy results on the internet is very difficult and all I could find out was: 1.A tory(not sure what type) was elected in 1906(although the constituancy was very different then), and was expelled from that party shortly afterwards. 2.At the 2001 the local rag said that if he won, he would become the seat's first non-tory M.P for 78 years, but they did not say who was M.P before then.

Alun Ephraim

Full details of general election since 1950 onwards can be found at [1].


NPOV?

[edit]

Is the last sentence appropriate for Wikipedia? It has the ring of POV. Jon Rob 15:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would say the sentence "Green Planning Studio’s success rate at appeals is high because they rely on the Government’s Planning Policies, and case law, to win their cases" is partisan (and, obviously, unsourced). Is there consensus to deleting it? Johnstoo (talk) 08:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthew Green (British politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]