User talk:UtherSRG
This is UtherSRG's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 7 days ![]() |
![]() |
zOMG
[edit]![]() |
zOMG | |
I, Hojimachong, hereby award UtherSRG A completely gratuitous zOMG barnstar, for being 110% awesome. Plus 1. --Hojimachongtalk |
WikiProject Mammals Notice Board
[edit]![]() |
Happy holidays!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3a/Christmas_tree_sxc_hu.jpg/70px-Christmas_tree_sxc_hu.jpg)
— mw (talk) (contribs) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Padshah UtherSRG 2024
[edit]You wrote "Since you can't explain in your own words, I see no reason to unblock you"
What own words? What do mean?
- What questions should I answer You just decline the unblock request.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Homo sapiens History (talk • contribs)
Non-willing editor
[edit]What can be done if an editor claims that something is not a good source, and when you ask him what can be done to make sure that the source is WP:RS he claims that no matter the result of RfC, no matter the result of RS noticeboard, nothing will make the source good enough to change his POV. He also was invited to dispute resolution once, but he ignored it and showed no will for discussion. I am doing my best, asking him what can i do to make sure sources are ok, but he doesn't care and says even if i have 10 sources, his 1 is better because it's "consensus in scholarship" even though i provided him with academic sources that clearly disagree. Don't know what can i do Setxkbmap (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- You can bring this up on an admin noticeboard. The general one is WP:AN. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Setxkbmap (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Restoration of a deleted article
[edit]I see that you restored the article Legal career of Keir Starmer after I had deleted it, not only without following the accepted practice of consulting an administrator before reverting their action, but without even informing me that you had done so. Why was that? JBW (talk) 23:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- This was done as a result of a request at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Legal_career_of_Keir_Starmer. I had draftified it. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I know that; my question was about why you did it without informing me. JBW (talk) 11:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Many types of RFU requests are regularly handled without consultation with the deleting admin. Draftifying a G5 has no requirement to do so. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- There is no requirement to do so, but I should have thought that at the very least it would be considered a courtesy to inform the administrator whose action you are reverting. Frankly I am astonished to learn that an administrator with as much experience as you have doesn't think so. JBW (talk) 21:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Many types of RFU requests are regularly handled without consultation with the deleting admin. Draftifying a G5 has no requirement to do so. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I know that; my question was about why you did it without informing me. JBW (talk) 11:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
why did you revert all of my edits?
[edit]not all of them were unconstructive. some might have been, but why did you revert the edits that were possibly constructive? Qxva (talk) 19:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- i noticed you didn't revert them all, but still most of them. what is your reason for reverting them? Qxva (talk) 19:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- nevermind, i saw that only the unconstructive ones were reverted. still, when i responded to someone, why did you revert my reply? Qxva (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Everything I revert looked like disruptive behavior. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- so saying "indeed" is disruptive? you reverted me when i said "indeed" Qxva (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- people respond "indeed" a lot Qxva (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- so saying "indeed" is disruptive? you reverted me when i said "indeed" Qxva (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)