Talk:John Burgoyne

Error Correction

I came across this and immediately noticed an obvious error. I am not a historian, but I know that John Burgoyne was NOT born in 1778 nor did he die in 2205.

What does "who is known to be brian bagg" mean? Is this some vandalism?Sir Akroy 20:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

--Duneatreides 05:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Chris

further reading

can someone find some further reading on this guy?

Yes. [1] and [2]. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 23:56, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)

"The Man Who Lost America" By Paul Lewis 1973; "Political and Military Episodes in the Latter Half of the Nineteenth Century..." by Edward B. De Fonblanque Gregg Press 1972Mjburgoyne 03:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Intro

That introduction seems strange. Burgoyne may have been known for his "arrogance, pompous attitude, and vanity," but that is hardly indicative of his place in history or what is most remembered about him. Can we change that? -- RPIRED 03:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

My history teacher told us that Burgoyne's entourage threw huge parties every night in tents, filled with affairs, champagne, and insanity in general. I found the story hilarious, even though I know this comment makes me sound like a troll. Why the heck do I not find anything written about the entourage?!!!!! --75.43.182.146 19:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Burgoyne's Revenge

In the book How to Make War by James Dunnigan (4th edition paperback p.300), John Burgoyne is mentioned as a prime example of choosing military leaders through nobility rather than ability, which often results in particularly inept leaders. This is sometimes called "Burgoyne's revenge" according to that book. Should there be some reference to this idea?

john burgoyne gentleman johnny!

I am facinated to know more now as i have recently found out general johnny is a distant relative of mine and i am only a 24 year old female and would love to learn more about what kind of character he is and more about his younger years? 84.13.42.78 12:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm a relative also

My grandmother's maiden name is Burgoyne, and she is a direct descendent of him, and so am I. I wonder where I could find a family tree without paying for it.

According to my research, John Burgoyne had two sons and two daughters with Susan Caulfield, John Fox, Edward, Marie and Caroline. John Fox had one son, Hugh Burgoyne, who was killed in a Naval Accident. I haven't been able to find out about any descendants beyond that. I would like to know more. As for myself, my ancestors came to America from Wales, but they were English and did not speak Welsh. Burgoyne is a Norman French name. According to our family history two brothers with the last name of Burgoyne came over with William the Conqueror in 1066. Mjburgoyne 03:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

  Mjburgoyne 16:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I was rereading "The Man Who Lost America" Paul Lewis (Noel Gerson). He states that Burgoyne fathered one son, John Fox, and three daughters Susan, Marie and Caroline. Lewis claims that John Fox had only one son Hugh. He died without any male heirs. At the Westminster Abby site it shows the children of John Burgoyne as John Fox, Marie and Caroline. It also shows that Charlotte, John's wife, is buried with her daughter. I could find no information about a daughter born to Charlotte. Lewis's book says she didn't have any children.Mjburgoyne 04:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Article needs a lot of work

I did a little cleaning up, but John Burgoyne is a fascinating and complex character, and I don't pretend to be a expert in 18th Century U.K. history. Scromett 13:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I think he missed his calling. Reading The Heiress, if you can put yourself in the mindset of the late 18th century, it's a laugh riot. That's the key, though, it wasn't Shakespearean, it was more aimed at the common man - intended, I think, for them to watch with the elite in attendance. Like watching some 80's cartoons as a kid, with your parents there. They get some jokes you don't, yet you understand some things they don't. ~Cal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:5400:B950:11C2:866B:71BA:7567 (talk) 23:34, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Contradiction

The article offers two different birth dates. I've added a template until someone can provide a source showing which (if either) is correct. Leithp 15:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

World Turned Upside Down

OK, so whether or not a song of this name was played at Yorktown is debated with (IMO) evidence for coming out on the losing side. However, that's a topic for another article.

What this section is about is the following line:

"In an ironic twist, a song from one of his plays The World Turned Upside Down was played by British bands during the surrender at Yorktown."

Now, ignoring the fact that the sentence's grammar is poor enough to present confusion over whether the song or the play was called "The World Turned Upside Down", there's another problem with this sentence: try to find any source that suggests this that isn't just copying this article. I did, since I wanted a source. (After all, why say "one of his plays" when you can say the name of the play itself?) I can't find any.

So I went to copies of Burgoyne's collected works, which can be found in two volumes:

• Volume 1
• Volume 2

From this, the following can be drawn:

• Burgoyne wrote (or translated) four plays: The Maid of the Oaks (1775), The Lord of the Manor (1780), The Heiress (1786), and Richard Coeur de Lion (1786).
• Of these, two (Heiress, Richard) were published at too late a date to meet the criteria of the statement, and one of them (The Heiress) contains no songs at all.
• Of the two plays that were published prior to the British surrender at Yorktown, neither of them contain the phrase "the world turned upside down" or any variation therefore, nor do they contain any of the lines commonly mentioned as belonging to the song in question.

In other words: without getting into whether or not the song was played, there is no evidence that it was present in any dramatic work of Burgoyne's. I've removed the line (again) until someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

-- 142.166.3.82 (talk) 18:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Personally i think that John Burgoyne was a very good leader. In history it talks about who won the war, how he lost and just rubs it practically in his face. I mean if he were alive he would be very angery. And right now i am so i think that shopuld change i also think that you shoul take that into consideration. I hope you and all the others know haw much this hurts some people in world. Some of those people are family members. They probably don't care but right now i do so if you want to talk to me about this just look me up and call me. I live in California. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.15.2 (talk) 09:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

You would do justice to his memory by learning to spell properly. Sioraf (talk) 01:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Gentleman Johnny

Many recent sources say Burgoyne was called "Gentleman Johnny," but the claim is untrue. It was invented for a play, The Devil's Disciple, by George Bernard Shaw in 1897.Catherinejarvis (talk) 19:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

File:BEP-GIRSCH-Surrender of General Burgoyne (Trumbull).jpg scheduled for POTD

Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:BEP-GIRSCH-Surrender of General Burgoyne (Trumbull).jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 17, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-10-17. Any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

This picture is an engraved vignette of the American artist John Trumbull's 1821 oil-on-canvas painting Surrender of General Burgoyne, depicting the surrender of British troops under John Burgoyne on October 17, 1777, at the end of the Saratoga campaign of the American Revolutionary War. The work is one of eight historical paintings that hang in the rotunda of the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C. The American victory at Saratoga had dramatic consequences on the war. Although some foreign states, notably France, had been supporting the American cause in the form of financial and material provisions, the French wished for no further involvement until the capture of a British army at Saratoga by American forces made them reconsider their level of commitment. This line engraving was produced for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) for use on United States banknotes.

Engraving credit: Frederick Girsch, Bureau of Engraving and Printing; restored by Andrew Shiva

Recently featured:

• Notre-Dame Basilica
• Wheat Fields
• Jessie Bonstelle