Talk:Lacuna
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
I don't think this needs to be moved to Wiktionary. Notice that a number of Wikipedia pages link to this one. It is now a stub, but that could change. Michael Hardy 03:13, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- If it could grow then I would agree with you, that it shouldn't move. Can you give me some idea why it could grow? Thanks. Sander123 12:39, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Because it's an important topic in the study of old manuscripts by historians. Michael Hardy 23:43, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
There could also be a list of notable lacunae, where we would love to know what is missing for a better understanding of the text...I can't think of any notable examples off the top of my head, but I'm sure there are some. Adam Bishop 23:49, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Lacunae were recently the subject of one of my quizzes in histology. I changed the name of the section from Anatomy to Histology as it is a feature commonly studied as a tissue.
Usage example
[edit]What does this mean? "This sentence contains 20 words, and […] missing". If it's talking about another sentence, the actual lacuna would be identified in that sentence, so this is not a good example. If it's talking about itself, it's poor grammar, and the self-reference is a bit confusing.
Could somebody clarify it, or come up with another example?
--Mark 83.151.192.197 12:19, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
In archaeology and monument preservation?
[edit]In the anastylosis article: "New construction for the sake of filling in apparent lacunae is not allowed". If this is a commonly-used term, perhaps it should be added here? Experts (or at least, people who have heard of the word in this context before today, unlike myself)?
Start a discussion about improving the Lacuna page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Lacuna" page.