Talk:Continuous obsolescence
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Starcraft ghost
[edit]A casualty of this phenomenon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.76.252.185 (talk) 07:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Is it an antipattern? Is it even a pattern?
[edit]What is this article about? The fact that some software survives many releases, and is being constantly rewritten? I think, this is the sign of success. Twitter did it, Facebook did it, Google did it. Is not it better than just throwing away the product and closing the company? Or I misunderstood something? The article is a puzzle to me. Vlad Patryshev (talk) 22:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Continuous obsolescence page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Continuous obsolescence" page.