Jump to content

User:Winhunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


Articles I...

[edit]

Created

[edit]

Expanded significantly

[edit]

My other accounts

[edit]

My bookmarks

[edit]
Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 134
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 70
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 101
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 23
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 5
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 62
Requested RD1 redactions 47
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 18
Open sockpuppet investigations 153
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 2
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 5
Other candidates 17
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 47 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
  • DarthAdolf (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
    Comment: Not a clear violation. I think I see where you are going with this, but unless you can show some evidence, it is a stretch to call it disruptive. You need more than this. -- Alexf(talk) 00:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. I would tend to agree with Alexf; while more uncommon since a certain historical figure had that name, Adolf is still a given name for people. I would suggest discussing your concerns with the editor first, then bringing it for discussion if your concerns are unresolved. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Rconsulting (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Also implies shared usage, paid editing. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 07:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. "R" could indicate a person who in "consulting" and is not necessarily the name of an organization. They may be a paid editor, but that is not a username issue. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: CTOPS. Borgenland (talk) 08:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please delete and protect the creation of this page. Protection has already been set at both Real Malabar FC and Real Malabar F.C.. Jonteemil (talk) 10:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: 2001:4C4D:1D83:4100:8C0E:C340:AC32:4DF5 keeps changing the colours on the timeline with out seeking consensus and against the norm of other pages Mewhen123 (talk) 10:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined See response below. GoodnightmushTalk 15:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: A non logged in user changes the colours on the timeline without consensus and against the norm of other pages Mewhen123 (talk) 10:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined See response below. GoodnightmushTalk 15:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: A non logged in user keeps changing the colours on the timeline without consensus and against the norm of other pages Mewhen123 (talk) 11:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined Happy to step in shortly, but please attempt to engage on the talk page or at least in edit summaries rather than just reverting first. GoodnightmushTalk 15:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – The move war continues after the protection expires. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anonymous editor has repeatedly removed dozens of films from the list in the article. It's not really clear what the reason is (the editor has described the sources as "vague" and "ambiguous"). Whether a particular film is an exponent of "New Hollywood" is open to challenge, but the correct approach would be to start a discussion on the talk page and state why you disagree with the film's inclusion, along with sources backing up your position (or alternatively an explanation as to why you don't think the sources used by the article are reliable. Some of the films removed (such as "Serpico", "Who's Afraid of Virgina Woolf" and "Last Tango in Paris") are so ingrained in the New Hollywood moement that it is hard to envisage a valid sourceable position that considers them otherwise. The editor should take the issue to the talk page and hopefully semi-protection would encourage them to do that. Betty Logan (talk) 12:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP whitewashing and removing of well sourced information - trying to hide ties with Russia. Paid SPAs interested only in removing sourced not pleasant material only. 80.98.145.168 (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/04/owner-uk-national-lottery-operator-to-sever-gazprom-ties good sources like this which demonstrate the person's ties with Russia are being persistently removed with false accusations. 80.98.145.168 (talk) 13:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks keep showing up to replace the org's logo with the Nazi flag. Covered under American politics contentious topic, so please consider lengthy protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent target for WP:LTA/Andrew5, both previous socks weeks ago and new ones from minutes ago. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 15:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated unsourced mention of a marriage by logged-in and logged-out editor. Woodroar (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP repeatedly adding reverted information. Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Page should redirect to Preston Arsement. Sahaib (talk) 06:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

7 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Wikipedia languages/core (request) 2024-07-27 11:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-07-30 19:50 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Editinginterface (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotices/Namespace/MediaWiki (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 Fully protected (log) Protected by Amalthea on 2011-05-31: "interface page, transcluded in MadiaWiki space"
MediaWiki:Pendingchanges-none (request) 2024-08-25 06:39 MediaWiki page (log)
User:HotArticlesBot/Config.json (request) 2024-08-27 11:03 User JSON page (log)
2024 Summer Olympics medal table (request) 2024-08-28 11:01 Fully protected, expires 2024-09-02 at 08:12:49 UTC (log) Protected by Lectonar on 2024-08-26: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
24 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Navbox (request) 2024-07-19 19:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ged UK on 2014-05-07: "lowering to template protection"
Module:Football box (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Football box collapsible (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Taxonomy/Archaeplastida (request) 2024-08-12 23:51 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mifter on 2018-12-07: "Highly visible template"
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-08-17 15:53 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Country data Turks and Caicos Islands (request) 2024-08-18 05:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox comedian (request) 2024-08-20 02:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:MultiReplace (request) 2024-08-20 06:46 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikAnimal on 2017-10-09: "Highly visible template; 34,000+ transclusions"
Module:Track gauge/data (request) 2024-08-21 13:05 Template-protected (log) From Module:RailGauge/data: Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2013-10-17: "High-risk Lua module: template-protection is now the default for high-risk modules"
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-08-21 21:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-08-23 03:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox church (request) 2024-08-23 03:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox song contest national year (request) 2024-08-23 19:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by CT Cooper on 2015-03-01: "Merging has increased use, so upping protection to template editors only."
Template:Infobox election (request) 2024-08-24 13:40 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-03-02: ">9500 transclusions, set to change from SP/A to TE/TE"
Template:Talk header (request) 2024-08-24 22:41 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2013-12-13: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Coat of arms (request) 2024-08-25 01:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Infobox political party (request) 2024-08-25 19:27 Template-protected (log) Modified by Plastikspork on 2016-04-16: "Recent malformed edits"
Module:Icon/data (request) 2024-08-25 20:36 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2015-01-23: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:WikiProject Computing (request) 2024-08-26 03:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 on 2016-12-01: "Highly visible template"
Module:Excerpt/config (request) 2024-08-27 04:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Johnuniq on 2020-08-30: "oops, meant to be TP"
Module:UserLinks (request) 2024-08-28 03:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2020-08-08: "no longer in interface"
Template:Country data Tajikistan (request) 2024-08-28 04:24 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Uw-block (request) 2024-08-28 07:39 Template-protected (log) Modified by NeilN on 2015-11-27: "Highly visible template"
Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org bibliography (request) 2024-08-28 13:17 Template-protected (log) Protected by Guettarda on 2019-10-04: "This is intended to be preloaded, and might end up edited accidentally by student editors."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Reviewer Aszx5000 has messaged me twice that I should be autopatrolled. I don't care for my sake, since the process works fine for me, but I don't want to be a burden on the reviewers. Please either grant or deny this status based on whatever you think is best for the community. Thanks! Jordanroderick (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. I've checked a couple of articles. The articles are all nicely formatted, have at least one citation per paragraph.
However, when I started spot checks in Design 1099 Ship, I noted a high rate of mistakes in terms of WP:INTEGRITY. I've tagged with citation needed / failed verification. I think it would be good for you to go back over articles and really make sure your citations fully support all the preceding text in the paragraph. You may want to nominate for WP:GA afterwards to see if you've really succeeded here (in all other aspects, the articles I checked seem to meet the criteria). —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Would like to cut down on the backlog of pages that need to be reviewed while I create pages, especially as of recent where I've been working on creating pages for military battles, and Bahmani rulers. I definitely believe the pages I've created shows I am familiar with the guidelines of page notability, and especially quality. I've practiced with this being a new page patroller myself. Noorullah (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I have created 25 new pages and would like to request the autopatrolled right. I have been a user since 2007, but have increased my writing on Wikipedia in the last 3 years. I create articles in generally non-controversial areas such as crystallography, symmetry and philately. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Fairly regular article creator and Did you know? contributor who appears to be familiar with the policies and guidelines surrounding notability and encyclopedic suitability. I don't believe it's a good use of NPP's time to be checking their creations. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Would like to confirm: does Di (they-them) want to be autopatrolled? Elli (talk | contribs) 17:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
@Elli: I have no objections, I think that if I'm considered trustable then it could be good to save time for patrollers. Di (they-them) (talk) 19:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 19:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Over many months has been creating appropriately concise articles of a consistent and appropriate format; I've reviewed several of them as part of NPP, and now think that the right is appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 23:14, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2012 and have created about 220 articles. Only three of those (that I recall) have ever had to be revised before they were accepted. Though many of my articles have not been rated particularly high on the assessment scale, I think that I am experienced & familiar enough with Wikipedia's policies that articles I create need not clog up the new pages feed. Best, JPRiley (talk) 02:09, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I have been an editor since 2020, but only really started ramping up my edits in February of this year. I have made 254+ pages (at least 4 of them are from redirects), 103 of which have been in the last 3 days. Another user (Ryan shell) suggested that I should apply. The only major issue that my articles have had in the past was me using AI, which I have acknowledged was wrong and promised not to do it again to an administrator, who worked with me on how to properly find info for articles without using AI. Most of my articles are stubs, and I feel like they can clog up the New Pages Feed a bit. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
As an update to the article count, I have (as of August 27) made ~286 pages, 136 of which have been in the last 4 days. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Experienced and frequent editor. Knowledgeable in article creation and assessment. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I have been contributing to Wikipedia, Wikidata, and Commons for over 10 years, especially on transportation-related topics. Since 2015, I have been serving as a Patroller on Turkish Wikipedia, which I believe has given me sufficient experience. Although I have some shortcomings, I believe I have a good understanding of the policies, which is why I would like to apply for this access level. Thanks for considering this request. bluetime93 💬 14:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 1 article. MusikBot talk 14:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. Autopatrolled is not an "access level". You can create new articles without being autopatrolled. Only after 25 creation without issues do we typically grant autopatrolled. It only means that the article doesn't get checked by new page reviewers. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


I would like to request use to see if it will be beneficial in helping fix banner shells on various pages. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Username change from JalenFolf. JalenBarks (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I am good at reviewing (outside Wikipedia, as part of my work). Cltr (talk) 04:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 8 days and has 421 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 04:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. Thanks for your interest, but with less than 500 mainspace edits, you don't meet the minimum requirements at this time. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
You also need to have been an editor for 90 days, not 8 days. Liz Read! Talk! 02:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

At the start of this year, I received an automated message inviting me to join New pages patrol, which I noticed again today, so here I am. I have written several new pages lately, and have nominated articles for deletion in the past, so I am aware of the procedures of AfD, PROD, and CSD. I also have experience with similar topics from my time as admin on the Dutch Wikipedia. I try to be friendly, in particular towards new users. Finally, I might not know every guideline and will probably make mistakes, but I'm always open to feedback and will try to improve. Thanks for considering this request. Dajasj (talk) 07:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 14:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I am requesting this permission to participate in the New Pages Patrol backlog drive. I have considerable knowledge in the AfD, PROD, and CSD deletion processes, as I have deleted pages in all three of them and have been involved in many deletion discussions. -1ctinus📝🗨 14:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done until the end of next month as a trial. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I participated in the May 2024 backlog drive, had fun and learned a lot. I had time-limited permissions last time, and would like to contribute again this time around. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm interested in participating in the September backlog drive! I have experience with deletion procedures and discussions, as well as with creating new pages. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talkcontribs) 19:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done, I'm impressed by the range and quality of your article contributions thus far. signed, Rosguill talk 21:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I would like to help with the current New Pages Patrol backlog drive. I have learned through experience and reviewing the official policies about the relevant guidelines and systems; I have always acted, and will always act, in a civil and good-intentioned manner. Mason7512 (talk) 20:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done for the duration of the backlog drive as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguill talk 21:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I previously received patroller rights in November of last year ([2]) to help diminish the backlog that existed then, and has grown/still exists now. Much of the same I said last time still stands, while I have little experience in AfD (some with PROD and CSD), I have spent a lot of time at RfD and with RMs, and I do have some limited experience with page creation. I also am very familiar with WP:COPYVIO and other general content policies and guidelines. estar8806 (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done signed, Rosguill talk 21:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I am interested in doing the September backlog challenge (my break will be over by then). I am typically active in AfD (usually participating, but sometimes nominating for deletion) and added in five articles via AfC as well the past year. Conyo14 (talk) 04:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done for the duration of the backlog drive as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 04:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I had planned to gain more experience with AfC before applying for this right, but I would be interested in taking part in next month's backlog drive. I have some experience with AfD (a couple of nominations and about 40 !votes), and I have been using the AfC tool since June. Mgp28 (talk) 09:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I am familiar with Wikipedia policies and want to help with the backlogs. Although this is my first time, I have experience reviewing new articles in WP:Tambayan Philippines. I would like to contribute to reducing the backlog. Royiswariii (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 41 days and has 308 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 12:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Zendrago X (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)

I am requesting permission to become a New Page Reviewer as I have considerable experience contributing to Wikipedia and possess a solid understanding of its guidelines and standards. I am aware of AfD (Articles for Deletion), PROD (Proposed Deletion), and CSD (Criteria for Speedy Deletion) processes. Additionally, I have also created and improved numerous pages, I am committed to maintaining high editorial standards and ensuring that new content meets Wikipedia's notability, verifiability, and neutrality criteria. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 11:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]


From time to time, I make the occasional page move, these are pretty much always uncontroversial moves. After seeing a move of mine from 6 months ago reviewed just today, I have decided, in the interest of reducing the backlog of editors who have to review my pages, to ask for this permission. Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

  • I don't see a lot of experience here, and I am not sure whether the request is indicating something related to the autopatrolled right, but for the time being I will just give a bit of feedback on a case I noticed. In May you moved Ricardo Cobo to Ricardo Cobo (Musician) in order to create a one-sentence stub on a different Ricardo Cobo. The disambiguator in this case should be in lowercase. More significantly, it appears that this was moved without any consideration of whether the mayor was the primary topic of the search term "Ricardo Cobo". The mayor's article gets fewer views than those of the musician, and when the stub was created, no hatnote link to the former occupant of that title was provided. Links were not fixed either, so for example, Guitar Foundation of America now links incorrectly to the mayor instead of the musician. Why did you decide to make way for the article on the mayor here? Did you consider making a disambiguation page? Dekimasuよ! 02:38, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
    To be honest, the upper case typo was a WP:MOS mistake on my part, I take full responsibility. As to whether it should have been a primary or secondary redirect. I felt that, per criterion 2, the mayor of a major city (pop 1 million +) usually has long term significance. I didn't feel there was a need for a disambiguation page with just two entries. As for the links, to be honest, at the time I just assumed Wikipedia fixed those during a move (you can WP:TROUT me for that one). Allan Nonymous (talk) 11:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
    Usually replacement of one article with an article on an unrelated topic without any intermediate step is not advisable precisely because it breaks things internally. Instead of a trout, can you help fix the links and lack of hatnote? Dekimasuよ! 21:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  • (non-admin comment) The group (really a list) that makes an editor's redirects automatically reviewed is the redirect autopatrol list (rather than page mover). However, the guideline is that users normally aren't nominated for that list until they have created 100 redirects. Currently, Allan Nonymous, you're at 12 live redirects created in the article space. (Deleted move redirects don't show up in the tool, since they aren't logged as page creations.) SilverLocust 💬 07:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Not done, mainly per lack of indicated need; reducing the backlog of page patrols really isn't what this permission is for, and I'm not seeing any indication (either in the application itself or in the move/edit histories) that this would be particularly useful. No prejudice against requesting in the future if this changes and the tools would be needed on a regular basis. Primefac (talk) 12:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

I want to help with the renaming of various LGBTQ child pages as a result follow-up to the main article LGBTQ now being LGBTQ as a result of the concluded Talk:LGBTQ#Requested move 14 August 2024 discussion that I initiated. Most of the child pages all have existing redirects that need to be page swapped and many are not just 1-iteration, so need to WP:ROUNDROBIN swapped, for which Page Mover permissions are required. I am aware of the policies around page moving and will respect the permissions as such. Raladic (talk) 16:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Raladic, what's the scale/scope of the pages needing moved? Best guess is okay, I don't necessarily need a specific number (my thought process here is wondering if WP:RM/TR might be a better route). (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 12:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Many, basically for many years all sub-pages that have the article title "LGBT" have followed the principle of "when the time comes that the main article 'LGBT' gets rename, then we'll rename the others" - that time has come now, so basically all sorts of other pages (and categories) that currently have LGBT in the title should be updated to LGBTQ now per WP:COMMONNAME, so basically very many pages under Category:LGBT that have LGBT in the name, including those categories as well.
Also likely the WikiProject LGBT itself. If there is some automated way to achieve that in bulk, then that of course would also be fine if that is what you were trying to get at with the Technical Request link. Raladic (talk) 14:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

General moves. Recently I've wanted to move some voting theory articles (e.g. participation criterion) to rephrase them in terms of their associated paradoxes (e.g. the no show paradox). I've typically found this makes them more intuitive to most people. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done per lack of demonstrated need, lack of RM and RM/TR experience, and more broadly speaking a rather high percentage of move reversals compared to the total number of moves. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello@AlexBobCharles. Most of your history looks good. Could you explain why you warned rather than explained after [3] this edit? Seems like a good faith error? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello . I withdraw my request because i do not plan to be very active on WP. I warned them because they seemed to be the same IP who made the same change a few hours before and got reverted and they didn't make any response to my edit summary AlexBobCharles (talk) 07:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn for bot. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I've been monitoring the pages in Wikipedia for a long time. I try my best to review new changes, revert any vandalism and provide authenticity. This permission will help me review the pages more fluently. MSouvik01 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello @MSouvik01. You don't seem to warn people consistently after reverting them. It's easy to do with WP:Twinkle. Could you commit to doing this? I also noticed that you rarely leave WP:edit summaries. It's good practice to let others know what your edit did! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done for now. Feel free to re-apply once you've addressed Femke's concerns and (assuming there are no other major issues) the answer is likely to be positive. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Did all the requirements and patrolled the recent changes page for a rotating number of days. My account also meets all the requirements. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 09:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done for no other reason than your application doesn't address the concerns from two months ago and gives the impression that you view the requirements as a mechanical tickbox exercise. We're much more concerned with a holistic evaluation of your understanding of policy. Feel free to submit another application that addresses the previous concerns and demonstrates your understanding of relevant policies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I am always looking for new ways to contribute to Wikipedia, and I have an extensive understanding of vandalism (I have rollback privileges, and have been fighting vandalism through almost all of my time here). I also have the Page Reviewer rights. OnlyNanotalk 16:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 17:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

I've been around for a couple years now, and have significant understanding of vandalism, npov, etc policies. NeoJade Talk/Contribs 20:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 02:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights I would like to help you by checking pending edits, I know Wikipedia rules very well. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 22:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 8 days. MusikBot talk 22:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done sorry, but you have only had an account for about a week. That is far too soon to apply for permissions. Please get some more experience first. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I affirm that I have read the related guideline, the related section on Wikipedia's Protection Policy, the tips for pending changes reviewers essay, the policies on vandalism, BLPs and such. I hope my editing track record shows that I am capable of reviewing edits. TheWikiToby (talk) 23:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to assist in more ways on Wikipedia. I am experienced and knowledgeable. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

I've been around for a couple years now, and believe rollback would significantly assist me in patrolling. I believe I pass all requirements and have sufficient experience with patrolling and dealing with vandalism. NeoJade Talk/Contribs 20:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 02:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Previously had rollbacker rights, back from a break. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting rollback rights Hello, I would like to obtain rollback rights to fight against vandalism, spam and any other non-constructive modifications, I know very well how to differentiate between a beginner user who simply makes a mistake, and a person who makes bad modifications voluntarily. Also I know how to use the Twinkle tool to leave warnings of cancellation of modifications on the discussion page of the users concerned. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 21:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done sorry, but you have only had an account for about a week. That is far too soon to apply for permissions. Please get some more experience first. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello @Elli. I understand that we don't give roles like that, on the other hand I don't really understand what seniority has to do with it, any sane person knows the difference between pure vandalism and a bad, unintentional modification, it's quite easy to spot what needs to be put back or not. See my posts on Noni Madueke, S-segment and on the discussions of the vandals concerned. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 09:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Challenging this denial will not result in Elli changing his mind, it reaffirms that you are not ready. You are a very, very new editor and permissions are given as a sign of trust that they won't be misused. You haven't been active long enough for this trust to exist. Come back after a few months of solid editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I actively patrol Recent Changes reverting vandalism and incorrect good faith edits using Twinkle. For every revert, I leave a notice to inform the editors why their edit is reverted. I would like to use a more advanced tool to make this easier. Ednabrenze (talk) 09:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 09:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
 Already done (automated response) by Malinaccier. MusikBot talk 20:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

[edit]

I believe that I'm a responsible editor with a lot of experience, and that I would make for a great template editor, especially in my areas of interest such as Eurovision, Geography and VexillologyIмSтevan talk 13:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 2.5)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~3500)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~200)
  4. Red XN (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: 3mo)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 3)
Primefac (talk) 12:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done, fails multiple criteria. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
I would like to point out that regarding guideline 4, I was reverting (what I percieved as) vandalism on an article, that my block was only applied to that singular page, with overwhelming support for the reverts, and that I chose not to dispute it since it was only a 48h block. As for the 5th, I simply don't tend to edit templates using sandboxes, but by pushing edits directly. It really seems like a redundant requirement since not everybody's editing style is the same. No comments on the 6th — IмSтevan talk 22:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
5 naturally leads into 6, because most TPE will request that a proposed edit be made to the sandbox before the change is implemented. If it is a trivial/"simple" change it is generally not counted towards 6 because sandboxing is unnecessary, and thus there is no demonstration of technical ability. Another thing that 5 and 6 demonstrate is that there is actually a need for this perm, not just "I think I might find this useful", because template screwups are probably the most widely-visible mistake one can make. In other words, the objective requirements get you a review, the subjective requirements determine whether your request is granted. If you do find yourself frequently seeing the need and making changes to protected templates, feel free to request again in the future. Primefac (talk) 10:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Fair, thank you — IмSтevan talk 10:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 1
    Requests for unblock 138
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 20
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 5

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 675
    Templates for deletion 195
    Categories for deletion 68
    Wikipedia files for discussion 31
    All redirects for discussion 459
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 21
    Possible copyright violations 22
    All articles proposed for deletion 220
    All files proposed for deletion 2
    Unsorted AfD debates 2
    All files with the same name on Commons 2
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 335
    Unknown copyright status 22
    Unknown source 8
    No non-free use rationale 3
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 9

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,239
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 445
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,446
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,633 0.5
    All articles needing rewrite 5,793 0.08
    All articles needing expert attention 1,319 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 38,895 0.57

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 10,883 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 524,841 7.63
    All articles lacking sources 84,196 1.22
    All unreferenced BLPs 738 0.07
    All articles needing additional references 462,646 6.73
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,440 0.06
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,470 1.53
    All articles with dead external links 303,837 4.42

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 137 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 18 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,721 0.03
    All articles to be split 818 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 0 -
    Stub categories 19,229 -
    All uncategorized pages 1,051 0.02
    All orphaned articles 56,054 0.82
    All articles needing copy edit 2,948 0.04
    All articles with style issues 19,372 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,736 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,559 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 435
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,646
    All accuracy disputes 15,738
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 1
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 3
    All articles to be expanded 66,264

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    [edit]

    Hong Kong

    [edit]
    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    [edit]
    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.