Jump to content

Talk:Mantophasmatidae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Phylogeny

[edit]

Wow! I just updated this page with the data that matched at ITIS, but now I see the South African museum website show there are now 14 species in 11 genera and 4 families (although 1 family is just a holding pen). I'm going to have to add this data here soon! - UtherSRG 14:34, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Everything past already - the families have been synonymised, and there is only one family again. And the species described by Klass et al. are highly doubtful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.80.177.75 (talkcontribs)


New paper due soon in Mol. Phyl. Evol.: "Phylogeny of the Heelwalkers (Insecta: Mantophasmatodea) based on mtDNA sequences, with evidence for additional taxa in South Africa" Dysmorodrepanis (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grylloblattid??

[edit]

Why on earth is there a picture of a japanese grylloblattid on this page? XD It's not the page for Notoptera... so it makes no sense at all, unless someone is trying to show the other notopteran suborder.. but the way it's placed makes it looks as if it's actually a mantophasmatid... which I origionally made the mistake of doing while trying to find evidence for notopera. (Me; Hey..... that mantophasmatid looks ALOT like a grylloblattid!! Hooray! They really do belong together!! *Squints* Wait..... that mantophasmatid really really looks like a grylloblattid......... wait............ IT IS!!! D: *dies*) XD It's a great picture though, and it would go great on the gryllobattodea page, we need some more pictures of the japanese grylloblattodea (or grylloblattidae... stupid notoptera). --Notoptera Is So Not A Real Order (talk) 05:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I'm removing the picture.. forgot the mention that, I'll put it on the grylloblattid page where it's natural habitat is C: --Notoptera Is So Not A Real Order (talk) 05:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mantophasmatidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chrisphasmanae

[edit]

I cannot find any species in the genus Chrisphasmanae. Can someone else add this information? Insektivore (talk) 16:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]