Talk:Susannah Lattin
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Why are there a long row of [Edit]s two-thirds of the way down the article? Nonplus 14:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
The [edits] are an artifact of having images in an article.
excessive quotations
[edit]it is rather ridiculous that there is far more text in references and further reading than the actual article. Secondly, this as been done by an editor with a certified history of copyright copy paste violations. I am going to trim, there is no need to have this. LibStar (talk) 12:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- I am restoring them, they are public domain sources. "Ridiculous" is not a wiki rule, it is a personal observation you are making on an article you have not contributed to. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 15:55, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Susannah Lattin page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Susannah Lattin" page.