Jump to content

Talk:Coronation of the British monarch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleCoronation of the British monarch is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 21, 2004.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 23, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
June 14, 2007Featured topic candidateNot promoted
November 4, 2007Featured article reviewKept
July 9, 2022Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Banquets

[edit]

In the 'banquets' section we have the following sentence:

"A banquet was considered in 1902 for Edward VII but his sudden illness put a stop to the plans."

It is somewhat contradicted by the Royal Collection on their website:

"The Coronation Banquet of August 1902 comprised no fewer than fourteen courses."[1]

Who is right? Also, a state banquet and ball were held at the palace in 1911,[2] and again in 1937.[3] Firebrace (talk) 15:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably it was the June 1902 one that was cancelled. DrKay (talk) 15:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So there was a banquet, it was just delayed. Now I'm trying to figure out which part of "since the 20th century" implies that a flypast happened at every coronation in the 20th century. You could infer it but it isn't implied... Firebrace (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"it has been traditional ... to watch a flypast by the Royal Air Force": since the one occasion it ever happened? One event does not a tradition make. Two can play at being a sarcastic asshole. DrKay (talk) 15:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If it happened last time then it will happen next time. The plans for the next coronation do exist. But I see what you mean... Firebrace (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coronation of the British monarch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sizable unsourced content (23 cn tags), some questionable sources: what makes undiscoveredscotland a high quality RS? (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Half-crown

[edit]

Linking the words "half crown" to an article on that subject (Half crown (British coin)) is obviously not coincidental[4] or "unrelated to the coin"[5]. The explanation for its removal is irrational. DrKay (talk) 06:46, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quite agree, "crown" has so many different meanings in the UK, the link helps to clarify the pun for younger/international readers who are not familiar with the pre-decimal coin. Firebrace (talk) 10:25, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. GoodDay (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]