Talk:Copenhagen Free University
Appearance
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep per nom withdrawn. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copenhagen Free University Self publicising semi-vanity page of non-famous and fraudulently named "university", which does not belong with encyclopedic content.
- Delete. Mat-C 19:49, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, vanity, but I NPOVed it a little and made it more descriptive. If they're making a political/philosophical statement by establishing CFU, then it may be of interest. Check it out and decide. I say keep. Alcarillo 20:54, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
- No vote: But from the website - Events: "Thru Tool Auto Academy we are exploring ways to exist. T.a.a could be a microsystem where concentrated thinking and useful communication are taking place. The umbrella under which we want to try out practical experiments with thoughts we find ourselves concerned with and feel like setting flames to. The stuff we dream about. We treat T.a.a as a temporary mechanism with selfdestruction-function and every possibility to disorganisation, change of structure and its founders" - Competition? ;o) But not a threat... --bodnotbod 21:01, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. - Lucky 6.9 21:26, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Deus Ex 22:14, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. They appear to be neither a student prank nor a diploma mill. TB 08:37, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Famous. Not vanity. Encylopedic. anthony (see warning) 15:35, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Copenhagen Free University page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Copenhagen Free University" page.