Jump to content

Talk:Purple frog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Definitely on the ball! Wetman 13:27, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Map

[edit]

Can the map show a more restricted region ? Shyamal 03:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Shyamal 07:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

[edit]

I think the introduction is out-of-date. There it claims that the frog forms its own family, but later on it is claimed that this was changed. Either the intro or the later bit needs to change. LWizard @ 20:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed i hope. Shyamal 04:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another purple frog from Suriname

[edit]

In a news report, Purple frog among 24 new species found in Suriname, dated 4 June, 2007, a purple fluorescent frog has been discovered. I don't know if there is any taxonomy available for this species yet. Perhaps some mention should go into the current article nevertheless? __meco 22:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does not look like a Sooglossidae or close relative. Except for the colour similarity, probably not relevant. Shyamal 03:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the one from Suriname is actually a Bufonid (Adelotus), so there is no relation whatsoever. --liquidGhoul 05:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link to scholarly article

[edit]

Not sure what info is in here, but may be helpful [1] Range distribution for sure. pschemp | talk 03:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and another: [2]] pschemp | talk 03:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I updated the map. Unfortunately there was still a coordinate in the journal which had the longitude marked with minutes of 64 ! Found yet another ref here and User:Kalyanvarma has offered some nice pictures from here. Shyamal 16:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Picture

[edit]

The picture is of the Sooglossidae which lives only in the Seychelles Islands not the purple frog. It is a distant relative but either way the picture is wrong. There's one on BBC new that clearly shows its purple

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3200214.stm

No longer monotypic

[edit]

There are now two species of purple frog/Nasikabatrachus with the 2017 discovery of Nasikabatrachus bhupathi. Most of the content here primarily refers to Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis and not the Nasikabatrachus genus.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Purple frog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

what do they eat and how?

[edit]

i have skimmed over this entire thing but there appears to be no explanation of their diet, how does a creature with such a small mouth eat, and how?@ 204.145.232.66 (talk) 20:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]