Talk:1995 in literature
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1995 in literature article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Policy
[edit]Is there a policy on these "year in literature" pages as to which books should go on the lists? I'm not saying that this might be useful: I'd just be interested to know whether the titles mentioned so far reflect personal preferences, best seller lists, books that have been taken up into the canon, or whatever. --KF 12:09 Mar 25, 2003 (UTC)
- Yes, exactly. - DavidWBrooks 23:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the 1995 in literature page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "1995 in literature" page.
Categories:
- List-Class novel articles
- Mid-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- List-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- List-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- List-Class Years articles
- Low-importance Years articles
- List-Class Years articles of Low-importance
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles