Jump to content

Talk:Postal worker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

67.162.170.108 04:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Dictionary listing, don't see how it culd be more. DavidWBrooks 14:34, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Jacob1207 14:57, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Could be expanded to describe different job functions, history &c. Will not be terribly fascinating, but clearly can be expanded beyond definition. --Daniel C. Boyer 14:59, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Badly phrased substub, acceptable topic but we probably all have better things to do than fix it. Happy to be proved wrong on this, keep if it is fixed in the 5 days. Andrewa 15:29, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • Keep. Now good stub. Andrewa 05:56, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, but only if something more is made of it. --Prichardson 16:22, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep and redirect to post office. Saul Taylor 20:23, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep as stub. (I've added a bit) Niteowlneils 01:18, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand (as stub or not). Wally 03:25, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep -- stub. Has potential. --Wolf530 10:52, Mar 29, 2004 (UTC)

Does anyone have a citation for the average pay? There's a 2001 report (http://www.usps.com/history/cs01/c1c-4.htm) that says that the The average pay and benefits for career bargaining unit employees is $54,481 per work year.Leuliett 20:30, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially useful story

[edit]

If anyone ever gets around to expanding this article, here is an interesting story from Slate about postal workers throwing mail away. It contains several links to similar stories, including this New York Times article from 1874. faithless (speak) 13:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Postal worker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]