Talk:Day and Night (cellular automaton)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
.dk
[edit]I made a symmetric variant of life some years earlier than Nathan Thompson's 1997 "day and night" variant.
I found a usenet article from 1992 (see link below) that shows this variant, but I defined this variant already sometime in the 80's.
The rule can be described as 24678/3578, but it is more interesting to observe that both survival and birth happens on the same sums of "live" elements in a 3x3 block, i.e., that the rule can be described as 35789, where the numbes are the sums in a 3x3 block that means birth or survival for the middle cell.
In any case, the link below shows both a period-30 pattern and two spaceships.
This life variant is used in Scott Draves' "Bomb" program (http://draves.org/bomb/).
Torben Mogensen (torbenm@diku.dk)
"Rule" or "automaton"?
[edit]Are these contradictory? Omphaloscope » talk 21:10, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Requested moves
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move the disambiguation page, per the discussion below. This page had already been moved when I arrived, but this also appears to have been in accordance with the discussion. Dekimasuよ! 22:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
– No primary topic here more notable than all other topics combined at Day and Night redirect to Day & Night (disambiguation). The cellular automaton (rule) fails the ["Day & Night is..." search test] in Google Book search, while in vanilla Google the Pixar cartoon Day & Night (2010 film) would be be a clearer claimant for primary slot. Although the category says "Cellular automaton rules" the only other disambiguated article has (cellular automaton) as a dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Despite my own significantly greater interest in the cellular automaton topic than any of the other meanings, I agree that it is not a primary topic (and I don't think any of the others are either). The proposed disambiguator looks ok to me. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support its such a generic sounding title that I'm sure that even people familiar with the subject may be uncertain as to what the article content might be under the title. Gregkaye ✍♪ 13:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support moving the cellular automaton article as nominated above. Since we don't have a single article on the day-night cycle, support moving the disambiguation page away from Day & Night (disambiguation), but it should probably be moved to Day and Night, which reads a bit more smoothly and matches the disambiguation page at Night and Day. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 16:27, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support moves to Day & Night (cellular automation) and Day and Night for the disambiguation page, as articulated by 209.211.131.181 above. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support per 209.211.131.181. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 22:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Amended RM template per 209.211.131.181 advice to move dab to Day and Night following others support In ictu oculi (talk) 02:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Start a discussion about improving the Day and Night (cellular automaton) page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Day and Night (cellular automaton)" page.