Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Iran's flag bearers at Paralympics
Iran's flag bearers at Paralympics

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

[edit]

Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives

September 2

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

International relations

Law and crime

Sports


RD: John Schultz (footballer, born 1938)

[edit]
Article: John Schultz (footballer, born 1938) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Western Bulldogs
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - 📝) 04:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Yagi (2024)

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Tropical Storm Yagi (2024) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Tropical Storm Yagi (pictured), leaves more than eleven people dead in the Philippines. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Tropical Storm Yagi (pictured), leaves at least eleven people dead in the Philippines.
News source(s): ABS CBN Rappler Inquirer
Not Ready Storm not ended 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - 📝) 06:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HurricaneEdgar is Not Ready don't close 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - 📝) 06:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment please correct me if I’m wrong but wouldn’t the correct term for a storm hitting the coast be something like “Typhoon XYZ hit ABC causing damage” not how the current suggested blurbs are written. Again please correct me if I’m wrong. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 09:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are many ways a nominator can write a blurb for a typhoon/hurricane/cyclone. See the blurb for the recent Typhoon Gaemi.
For example, it can be like "Storm leaves more than number dead across this country" or "At least number people are killed when storm makes landfall over this country." With that said, I'm still not satisfied with either of the blurbs and I don't see this being posted on the ITN at the moment. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 10:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I had a problem with the grammar as “typhoon Yagi hit on Philippines” or “has hitted” makes no grammatical sense. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 11:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
27.96.223.192 Yes it's typhoon Yagi hit on Philippines. Can fix? 🌀TyphoonAmpil🌀 (💬 - 📝) 11:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t mean to be the grammar police but the I believe the correct term is “Typhoon Yagi has hit the Philippines causing XYZ damage”. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 12:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the correct term is "Tropical Storm Yagi". That said, despite weaking significantly, it appears it will strengthen significantly, and is forecast to hit the Hainan province of China as a category 3, if not 4, Typhoon; and and then head straight for Hanoi in North Vietnam, where it could be a category 1. So let's wait and see if this becomes a Typhoon and does some serious destruction. Nfitz (talk) 21:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In its current state, not ready and not WP:ITNSIGNIF Schwinnspeed (talk) 09:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 1

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Linda Deutsch

[edit]
Article: Linda Deutsch (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Associated Press
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

240F:7A:6253:1:7969:2ABE:E6E3:A515 (talk) 02:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 31

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Science and technology

Sports


RD: Stevie Cameron

[edit]
Article: Stevie Cameron (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBC, Toronto Star
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Canadian journalist and author. 240F:7A:6253:1:A178:C2E3:6140:3A54 (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Obi Ndefo

[edit]
Article: Obi Ndefo (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1], [2]
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Happily888 (talk) 01:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Kamchatka Mil Mi-8 crash

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2024 Kamchatka Mil Mi-8 crash (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Russia, 22 people die after a Mil Mi-8 (similar aircraft pictured) crashes in Kamchatka. (Post)
News source(s): BBC - Moscow Times - Euromaidan Press
Credits:

Nominator's comments: 22 people are dead after a tour helicopter crashed over a volcano in Kamchatka, Russia. The article is largely okay, disregarding the fact that it may need expansion. — Knightoftheswords 15:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, notable recent accident with fatalities and property loss. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sol Bamba

[edit]
Article: Sol Bamba (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sport
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Former Soccer Player/Coach Haris920 (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Fatman Scoop

[edit]
Article: Fatman Scoop (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Billboard, NBC News
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

American rapper. 240F:7A:6253:1:344E:215E:92:A3B3 (talk) 16:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Ready article has a lot of CN tags, also cause of death isn't known yet Scu ba (talk) 16:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Needs work per Ad Orientem. Kcmastrpc (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Discography and awards sections need more sourcing. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

X blocked in Brazil

[edit]
Article: Brazilian investigation into Elon Musk (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: X is blocked in Brazil. (Post)
Alternative blurb: X is blocked in Brazil amidst an investigation ruled by Supreme Federal Court.
News source(s): The New York Times AP News
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Unusual block for a democratic country. ArionStar (talk) 10:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose I've been watching this one, and this is more about Musk refusing to comply with a judge that is upholding Brazilian law regarding social media and misinformation. Its basically more a situation of his own choosing rather than some new massive draconian measure (like when Turkey did it some years back), and as such, while its in the news, its not the type of story we should be posting because the situation was entirely avoidable (Musk just had to give the court a legal representative to deal with the case, he refused). --Masem (t) 12:12, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "… upholding Brazilian law…" LOL! ArionStar (talk) 12:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, the original order back in 2020 was due to specific accounts that were ordered blocked due to misinformation including threats to the judiciary. Brazil doesn't have as wide open a free speech policy as the US, so while controversial they were still reasonable under that. Masem (t) 12:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Brazil has reasonable free speech - I don't think comparing it to somewhere as backwards as the United States, where free speech is out of control and protects hate speech, is useful. Nfitz (talk) 22:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This is complete nonsense and entirely of Musk's making. This has literally nothing to do with "free speech" and everything to do with Musk's refusal to comply with a basic court order issued by the independent judiciary to appoint a legal representative in Brazil. AusLondonder (talk) 12:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:POV, irrespective of the motives/arguments this is a pretty big decision PrecariousWorlds (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This just another case of Musk throwing a tantrum. Also failure to appoint a legal representative is not censorship nor anything to do with a democratic deficit. Abcmaxx (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Musk being Musk. Skyshiftertalk 13:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This was a decision of Brazil's supreme court, can't really be entirely attributed to "just Elon drama", this is a major ruling PrecariousWorlds (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Given it's a case of "Brazil makes a legal request, Musk ignores the legal request instead of engaging like any reasonable person would and Brazil escalates in response", it really is just Elon drama. --2001:8003:1C20:8C00:A599:8FED:E2E0:7A4A (talk) 10:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The discussion above provides a perfect example of editors using their own personal opinions and biases instead of relying on coverage by WP:RS. Whatever we think about Musk as an individual is completely irrelevant, or at least it should be. Even if one accepts that Musk is 100% at fault in this episode, the result is that X is blocked in Brazil, an event that is covered as a top story by pretty much every news outlet in the world and which affects the seventh most populous country in the world. Nsk92 (talk) 14:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We are not a newspaper and simply don't follow what is published in headlines. ITN is supposed to feature quality articles that happen to be in the news, not to be where we are reporting on news, and that's why simply being a highly published story is not sufficient for being in ITN. Besides this being an issue with Musk being Musk, which has become routine news, we do not have any good article target here that discusses the entire matter (starting with the original court order to block certain accounts). — Masem (t) 15:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Neutral point of view is policy, and the blurb is total clickbait. RAN1 (talk) 15:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nsk92: when I initially opposed the nomination the target article was Censorship of Twitter at the time of my comment, which was a highly biased target to nominate and my argument was that this issue is not to do with censorship but more so to do with the failure to adhere to a court ruling; this was also the basis of other editors' arguments and reasonings to oppose too. Abcmaxx (talk) 19:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose just the Brazilian government throwing a tantrum. Scu ba (talk) 15:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but a lot of things can be viewed as just "governments throwing a tantrum", doesn't affect notability. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its banned because Musk refused to provide legal representation to the court, not because the state wanted to block X completely. If we're talking about the free speech implications, that should have been the story when the court first ordered social media there to block specific accounts, several months ago. Masem (t) 15:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Not voting either way at the moment, but the comments here about this being simply a dispute with Musk seem to miss the mark. This situation IS largely of Musk's doing, but that doesn't mean the impacts are not relevant to post here. That's similar to saying that a war between two countries wouldn't be ITN material if it had grown out of a private dispute between the leaders of two countries. Whether or not it's "censorship" really shouldn't matter much. This discussion should be about if we believe X being blocked is noteworthy enough to post. DarkSide830 (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Oppose purely on article quality. The newly created article is only barely more than a stub. However, and whatever our opinions of the case, it's potential to impact the debate over free speech and the regulatory power of the state is both obvious and highly significant. Support on merits. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ad Orientem the article has been improved since then. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @RodRabelo7 Thanks for the ping. Moved to support. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on merits. Regardless of who did what, or whether the situation was avoidable, Xitter being blocked in one of the world's largest countries is definitely notable. However, the blurb is a bit short, and linking to Censorship in Brazil instead of Brazil is a MOS:EASTEREGG that should ideally be avoided. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:15, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Support/Wait Didn't something happen in Turkey a few weeks ago where an Instagram ban was instituted but reverted a few days later? I'm wondering if this is going to be a similar situation and will be walked back in the next day or two. I'd err on waiting to post, at least until Monday. Kcmastrpc (talk) 16:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Article is extremely stubby. Does not even mention A.Wagner's point above that the trigger for the block was X/Twitter's refusal to appoint a legal representative (nor does it mention X/Twitter's reasons for not complying). Also oppose "Brazil" linking to "Censorship in Brazil" - are we really going to parrot Musk's POV here? If we post this (once an up-to-standard, neutral article exists), let's have readers make up their own mind whether it's a censorship issue or not.
  • EDIT: moving to Weak Support following expansion of the article. Still disagree with linking to "Censorship of Twitter". Khuft (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Khuft the article has been improved since then. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I mean the government demanding the removal of certain political and religious figures from the site is a pretty clear case of censorship. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 08:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As I mentioned in another discussion, there are different conceptions on what constituted freedom of speech and hate speech. In Continental Europe (France, Germany) platforms are required to act against hate speech, and this is not considered censorship. I'm not really familiar with Brazilian conceptions of freedom of speech, but from what I gather from the article & the news, it seems to follow a similar concept of going against hate speech in the context of the invasion of the Brazilian Congress. Khuft (talk) 13:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per A.WagnerC. This happened because Musk failed to appoint a legal representative of Twitter in Brazil, which, to me, is not something we should post. Also, the article is not ready for the main page. Gödel2200 (talk) 17:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Help Can anyone help to improve the article? Alternative blurb added. ArionStar (talk) 17:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article is way too short and underdeveloped for ITN Hungry403 (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs to be improved, it is very interesting for ITN. ArionStar (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article is in better shape now. ArionStar (talk) 01:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hungry403 the article has been improved since then. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support. We should not evaluate the merit of the case as being merely a "tantrum" from Musk (much less from Brazil, shame on whoever said that), nor should we consider it as a case of censorship, which it clearly is not. The fact is that the event received extensive coverage worldwide. The New York Times and the Associated Press even used a breaking news alert to report it. Furthermore, it is a watershed moment, as it involves a democratic nation blocking a social network after it disobeyed legal orders, and Brazil represents a significant portion of Twitter's total user base. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How many times has Musk caused a problem with a government? I’m not certain but this definitely isn’t the first time and I dont believe we posted the other ones. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 08:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a blocking affecting one the largest X markets. Period. ArionStar (talk) 14:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t believe any blocking of any social media platform in only certain countries is ITN worthy, if it was a worldwide ban that would be different. 27.96.223.192 (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose not something blurbworthy IMO. If we didn't posted the news of the arrest of the founder of two popular social media sites then we should not post news about closure of a social media platform in a single country. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @PrinceofPunjab: which arrest? ArionStar (talk) 14:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @ArionStar I am talking about this one. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 15:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a random country. A major democracy and one of the largest Twitter markets. RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support – Widespread coverage, one of the most popular websites in Brazil blocked by its Supreme Court which is unusual for the country. For the editors saying this is just a "tantrum" for Musk... it's a judicial/political decision made by Brazil in response to Musk, not just Musk shitposting on X. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 15:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ready? ArionStar (talk) 17:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There's not even remotely a consensus to post, so no. The Kip (contribs) 20:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This may well happen in a number of other countries if Musk carries on taking X down the rabbit hole of supporting some seriously unpleasant stuff. And we can't really post every time Musk has a tantrum, or the whole of ITN would be full of it. Black Kite (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We can't predict that this may well happen in a number of other countries if Musk carries on and this sort of prediction shouldn't affect the notability of Brazil's current ban. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 18:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No, we can't, but what happens if we post this and then Musk does something so egregious that other countries follow suit? We'd have a problem. But regardless, I don't think this rises to the level of ITN anyway. Black Kite (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The blocking is still ongoing and I imagine there will be millions in money losses in the coming days. ArionStar (talk) 19:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see that X is losing a significant amount of money immediately here; I suppose some losses are possible if Brazilian advertisers withdraw from the platform (or possibly companies who do a large amount of their business in Brazil). Nevertheless, this is what happens when the owner of a company believes it is above the law. Black Kite (talk) 20:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Masem. Not very interesting in my opinion. C F A 💬 20:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Per most of the above. It's not really worth mentioning in my opinion. This has nothing to do with censorship as Brazil blocked the site in response to Musk failing to obey a simple court order. If the arrest of Pavel Durov or another, Montana blocking TikTok wasn't posted on the ITN, a social media site that just got blocked in a single country shouldn't be posted either. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 20:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - big story with huge ramifications. I'm not sure why it's being compared to a sub-national jurisdiction like Montana, which has no ability to enforce a ban. Or authoritarian countries like Turkey. Brazil is one of the largest democracies in the world. And this has significant coverage. Think about it - if this ban was by the US Supreme Court, would those that oppose, still oppose it? Nfitz (talk) 22:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly! Brazil's Supreme Court < US Supreme Court? ArionStar (talk) 06:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I would still oppose if it was a decision by the US Supreme Court. Does not seem particularly significant. Should it really go into the column on top of "More than four hundred people are killed in an Islamist militant attack in Barsalogho Department, Burkina Faso."? Belongs to DYK. C F A 💬 13:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as highly notable event about social media in large market; the WP:POV or WP:CRYSTAL arguments such as this being Musk's own doing or that further blocks in other countries may occur in future are irrelevent in regards to the significance and notability of this case. Happily888 (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • OpposeComment When Wikipedia was entirely blocked in Turkey over the content in a single article on the English Wikipedia, the nomination was dismissed due to navel-gazing and lack of significance even though it was a clear instance of censorship. Now we have a block of another very popular website in another large country due to lack of legal compliance. The story additionally entails some non-democratic measures that harshly violate digital freedom, such as fining people who access X and removing VPN apps for download, but the nomination is not about Internet censorship in Brazil. This is sheer navel-gazing on X and Elon Musk.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There's a huge difference between an autocracy and one of the world's biggest democracies. That said, if that was a mistake (perhaps link the discussion?), that shouldn't effect this discussion. Nfitz (talk) 08:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That makes sense, but this nomination's goal is not to highlight democratic backsliding in a democratic country, which is probably what posting this blurb would convey as a message to our readers. Internet censorship is a very sensitive topic, so it's very unclear to me whether we should post such blurbs at all. I revoked my oppose votes and transformed it into an ordinary comment because it mostly draws a parallel to a similar instance from the past.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moving to support. This move directly impacts about 20 million people within Brazil alone, likely more depending on how many people you believe are impacted that do not have Twitter accounts, and presumably people outside of Brazil that interact with these accounts. Businesses and nonprofits use it for outreach, advertising, and fundraising. Politicians use it to interact with their constituents. The NFL coming this week is also a big deal here, and most importantly the suddenness of all of it for users is a problem. I think at this point it's really hard to downplay the impacts here. DarkSide830 (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Use of Twitter is a privilege, not a right. It would be a different story if the court ordered the whole Internet in Brazil to be shuttered, now you have an actual measurable impact. Instead, we have one of many social media platforms blocked, with other alternatives available. Masem (t) 15:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The MP is not an appropriate place to defend positions. And there are still other social media. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 23:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse posting: Brazil is a country of ~200 million people, 7th highest, about equal to the UK, France, and Italy combined. Xitter, a cursory Web search informs me, is one of the top 25 or so most-visited websites, this side of the Great Firewall. (Different places give varying figures) Anyone want to take the other side of a bet that if UK France and Italy's govts all imposed national blocks of, say, Netflix or microsoft.com, that it wouldn't make its way onto ITN? (Whatever happened to the complaints of ITN being too US/UK-centric?)

Let's play it from the top. Purpose of ITN:

  • To help readers find and quickly access content they are likely to be searching for because an item is in the news.
  • To showcase quality Wikipedia content on current events.
  • To point readers to subjects they might not have been looking for but nonetheless may interest them.
  • To emphasize Wikipedia as a dynamic resource.
    — WP:ITNPURPOSE

--Slowking Man (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 30

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


Akarotaxis gouldae

[edit]
Article: Akarotaxis (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A new species of dragonfish, Akarotaxis gouldae, has been discovered in the Southern Ocean (Post)
News source(s): Cosmos, Earth.com Phys.org
Credits:

This recent scientific discovery may be of interest to ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Jean-Charles Tacchella

[edit]
Article: Jean-Charles Tacchella (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): X - Le Monde
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: French screenwriter and film director. — Knightoftheswords 19:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose multiple cn tags. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Shanshan hits Japan

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Typhoon Shanshan (2024) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Typhoon Shanshan, the strongest of 2024, hits Japan, killing more than six people. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Typhoon Shanshan leaves at least six people dead in Japan.
News source(s): CNA, Reuters, Al Jazeera
Credits:

The typhoon is the strongest of 2024, over a million told to evacuate; electricity power gone in many places in Japan. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 06:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: One of the strongest in 2024 so far. I feel "the strongest (typhoon) of 2024" should be dropped as none of the sources mention this directly and comes across as puffery. 31.44.224.222 (talk) 08:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt: But the strongest storm may change; remember, Cyclone Djoungou was stronger than Typhoon Shanshan. HurricaneEdgar 08:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re: "strongest" WP:ITNBLURB reads: Blurbs should generally avoid comparison to any previous event, such as "Largest in the region since [year]". Previous events is generally out of scope of the page, and confers a publication bias favoring regions with a low frequency of similar events.Bagumba (talk) 11:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Alternative blurb; 2024 still has a few months left O.o -- death toll is likely to rise as well. Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:49, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, the impacts could be way more noteworthy in the coming days. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support it's a Typhoon, that's notable enough for inclusion. Scu ba (talk) 17:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A Typhoon is equivalent to a Class 1 hurricane. Not even Class 5 hurricanes are automatically notable. This region alone averages 16 typhoons a year. We 100% are not posting every typhoon. Nfitz (talk) 00:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Six deaths for a natural deaths seems a bit low for it to be blurbworthy. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:21, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Tūheitia Paki

[edit]
Article: Tūheitia Paki (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [3][4][5]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Dhantegge (talk) 20:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support article is well-sourced and well-written. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 22:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose not enough information about his death- spinning it off into a death article and leaving only one sentence in the main article is not enough information for ITNQUALITY. Also "Tekau-ma-Rua and Te Kahui Wairua" is improperly sourced- some of the text is sourced to a dead link from 2019, but the 2 tables say "as of 2020 and 2021", and so are outdated and unsourced. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, I wanted to query whether he was transformative enough to warrant a blurb or not. The Death of Tūheitia Paki article seems to be well under way and I would like to get the ball rolling as to whether it would be optimal or not. Ornithoptera (talk) 08:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, I’ve thought about that as well. Transformative within New Zealand? Certainly. Outside of the country? I have not seen much evidence. He had interacted with world leaders and indigenous leaders, but I don’t think there is enough of it. Schwede66 00:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait Tekau-ma-Rua and Te Kahui Wairua section have four cn tags otherwise article is good to go. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 29

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Sports


(RD posted) RD/blurb: Johnny Gaudreau

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Johnny Gaudreau (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  American hockey player Johnny Gaudreau (pictured) dies at the age of 31 (Post)
News source(s): Columbus Dispatch
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

I'm proposing a blurb considering the young age and his huge popularity worldwide. Would prefer a picture with the CBJ tho --Roncanada (talk) 12:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One could make the argument that this is a "death is the story" blurb... only 31, killed along with his brother while riding bikes a day before his sister's wedding. Certainly newsworthy. Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I spent a long time last night hoping this wouldn’t have to be posted. Life is goddamn cruel, man. Support RD, and honestly support blurb per Pawnkingthree - he was a superstar that died in his prime in an utterly tragic accident. The Kip (contribs) 12:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose currently the article does not meet WP:ITNQUALITY are there is too much unsourced content. If that is fixed, then Support RD only- does not meet threshold for a death blurb in my opinion, as In general, if a person's death is only notable for what they did while alive, it belongs as an RD link. Which looks to be the case here, as the death event is not notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb Tragic for sure, but he was far from being a 'superstar' such as Connor McDavid, Alexander Ovechkin, Sydney Crosby or Evgeni Malkin among other active players. I'd like to see more details on the death as the main story to consider it for posting, but it seems like there's very little information on the accident so it cannot be considered independently notable.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb when article citing issues are resolved and more details about the death are covered (sources exist). Note: COI here, I am a cyclist, and I have lost friends due to drunk drivers. This is a tragedy, and acknowledgement of this incident can only help raise awareness of the dangers of cyclists having to share the road with mass and momentum operated by impaired drivers. Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kcmastrpc: We cannot and should not post anything to raise awareness of any cause, however noble the sentiment and cause may be. This would be a slippery slope and lead to all sorts of issues on other topics and we are not here to right great wrongs. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should show nothing more than the facts; anti-drink driving campaigns and cycling safety awareness should be left to others, not here. Abcmaxx (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb Nothing in the article gives the impression as a great figure within hockey, and while a tragic death, not comparable to the type of blurbs where the death is the story. Oppose RD on quality. --Masem (t) 13:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support RD, quality has been fixed (there's one unsourced sentence in International Play but that should be trivial to fix since its just about being part of a notable team event. --Masem (t) 16:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD quality issues have been fixed. Blurb is a bit much considering he was not the biggest active figure in hockey at any time during his career. Klinetalkcontribs 14:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb, but with the quality issues being fixed, definitely support RD. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 14:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb per Masem, but support RD as sourcing issues appear to have been fixed. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD I don't think there will be consensus for a blurb, but sourcing issues look to be resolved. Pawnkingthree (talk) 16:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Blurb His manner of death is getting a lot of coverage and he was quite notable in his field. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:20, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support RD. This is a well-liked player cut down in his prime by another person's bad choices. This serves as a reminder about the dangers, and frankly stupidity, of drunk driving. Theletterm1973 (talk) 17:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD Quality issues fixed. Weak support blurb Due to manner of death. I remember seeing a lot of users saying that a death blurb makes sense when the subject died suddenly/non-conventional cause of death AND/OR were at the top of their field. Don't think this particular individual was at the top of their field, but his death was sudden and his death is gaining substantial coverage. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fine for RD, oppose blurb. Not in any sense a blurbable figure, regardless of the extremely tragic manner of death. Black Kite (talk) 20:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD for sure, the article looks decent. Oppose blurb. As much sad as it is, he is not notable enough for a blurb. win8x (talking | spying) 20:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Just a friendly reminder for those who are opposing a blurb because he is not "notable enough." The criteria for blurbing a death have nothing to do with the subjects' notability, other than they are a prominent (not major) figure, and the circumstances around their death are gaining widespread international coverage; please see WP:ITNRDBLURB, specifically Death as the main story. If the person's death itself is newsworthy for either the manner of death or the newsworthy reaction to it, it may merit a blurb. I would argue that Johnny Gaudreau is a prominent figure, and the circumstances surrounding his tragic demise rise to blurb worthiness. Kcmastrpc (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is nothing in the article to demonstrate he was a prominent figure. Perhaps one of the top players, but when are talking major figures in a field, we are usually talking about those that can be shown to be the elite of the field (eg for hockey, that would be someone like Wayne Gretzky or Bobby Orr.) Masem (t) 20:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You mentioned major figures in a field, which is the criteria mentioned for WP:ITNRDBLURB on the third bullet. I'm suggesting that he is a prominent figure in his field whose death is receiving international coverage. What bar would need to be met to be considered "prominent," is it "major" or something else? Kcmastrpc (talk) 20:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Ideally a dedicated section using reliable sources that clearly explain how he was a major figure in the field. Otherwise, we're hand-waving how significant he was based on editorial opinion, which we should be avoiding. Masem (t) 20:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree, generally, we shouldn't be editorializing, but the criteria for ITN death blurb given the circumstances is "prominence", not being a "major" figure. (Am I missing something?). Here's one news source, Johnny Gaudreau was a prominent figure in the NHL. [link] Kcmastrpc (talk) 20:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC) Kcmastrpc (talk) 20:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Opposing based off of one criterion is completely fine. In particular, the clause for "death as the main story" says: "If the person's death itself is newsworthy for either the manner of death or the newsworthy reaction to it, it may merit a blurb." People can certinaly support based off of just this criterion, but there is no requirement that opposers need to be in opposition based off of this criterion. Gödel2200 (talk) 21:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Right, but it appears that most of the opposes are citing his (lack of) notability, not the circumstances regarding his death or the reaction. I realize this is ITN and folks can oppose for any reason they chose, I was just trying to reason with editors and perhaps change their minds. Kcmastrpc (talk) 22:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blurb While he was one of the best players within hockey, he doesn't have nearly the same level of significance or fame as other people posted onto ITN who have died. Still an extremely tragic death, RIP. Hungry403 (talk) 23:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Abu Shujaa

[edit]
Article: Abu Shujaa (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Palestinian militant killed in the West Bank. Gödel2200 (talk) 01:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support article is in a okay shape now. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 28

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


(Posted) RD: Steve Silberman

[edit]
Article: Steve Silberman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Relix
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Thriley (talk) 21:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support article is in a good shape and I think is ready to be posted. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Charlotte Kretschmann

[edit]
Article: Charlotte Kretschmann (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

MrJaydenfire (talk) 21:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support meets bare minimum requirement. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 10:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Article is sufficiently well-sourced for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2024 Summer Paralympics

[edit]
Article: 2024 Summer Paralympics (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: The Summer Paralympics open in Paris, France. (Post)
News source(s): NBC News
Credits:

(Closed) Victoria Siddall

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Victoria Siddall (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Victoria Siddall becomes the first woman appointed as director of the National Portrait Gallery, London. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 27

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Bob Carr

[edit]
Article: Bob Carr (Michigan politician) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Legacy.com
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

240F:7A:6253:1:7969:2ABE:E6E3:A515 (talk) 02:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Juan Izquierdo

[edit]
Article: Juan Izquierdo (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN, The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Tragic death, Uruguayan footballer, at the time at Nacional. Article can easily be expanded given the news attention. Abcmaxx (talk) 07:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support could do with some expansion mainly a photo but otherwise looks alright and may he rest in peace. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 08:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All fixed now, Thanks Abcmaxx. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a deletion discussion on the image. The argument presented by the nominator is how likely there is a free photo existing of somebody who played 115 top-flight games in the present era. As per cases I remember like César Luis Menotti, the image should be hidden until the discussion concludes. Nothing says an item needs a photo in order to be posted. Unknown Temptation (talk) 12:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn’t say it needed one it would just help the article and I didn’t add the picture so I cannot comment on its eligibility. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 22:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Leonard Riggio

[edit]
Article: Leonard Riggio (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Bloomberg, ABC News
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former chairman of Barnes & Noble. 240F:7A:6253:1:6C23:2F26:C0C6:C9D6 (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added that info to the end of the 1st paragraph in the “Career” section. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 06:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Polaris Dawn

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Polaris Dawn (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ SpaceX's Polaris Dawn mission, set to launch at 07:38 AM UTC on August 27, is delayed for 24 hours after a helium leak. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ SpaceX's Polaris Dawn mission, set to launch early in the morning on August 27, is delayed for 24 hours after a ground-side helium leak.
News source(s): https://www.space.com/spacex-polaris-dawn-launch-delay-helium-leak, https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/spacex-polaris-launch-postponed-helium-leak-detected-rcna167168, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/08/27/spacex-polaris-dawn-launch-date-time/74962772007/
Credits:
Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw (as nominator) per others, I will renominate once the space walk is carried out. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 19:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Nabil Elaraby

[edit]
Article: Nabil Elaraby (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Egypt Today
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Secretary General of the Arab League. Needs a tid bit of sourcing work — Knightoftheswords 03:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 26

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime


[Reviewers needed] RD: Danelle Barrett

[edit]
Article: Danelle Barrett (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://usnhistory.navylive.dodlive.mil/Recent/Article-View/Article/3887359/in-memoriam-rear-admiral-danelle-m-barrett-usn-ret/ https://www.wgrz.com/article/life/wny-native-retired-rear-admiral-danelle-barrett-remembered/71-a0c5084d-8288-4415-8792-62e8b998d2f2
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

22:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Weak oppose. Firstly, the line in the lead saying "She was one of fewer than 200 women in history to achieve the U.S. Naval rank of admiral" appears to be cited to charlesmizrahi.com, which I'm not sure is reliable. Secondly, there is no mention of her being promoted to admiral at all in the body. So I think this is slightly incomplete at the moment. Otherwise, a decent enough short article. @Tim1965 and Jkaharper:  — Amakuru (talk) 09:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sid Eudy

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Sid Eudy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, NYT, USA Today, WWE
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

American professional wrestler and former WWE/WCW world champion better known as Sid Justice, Sid Vicious, or Sycho Sid. Article needs a lot of work. The Kip (contribs) 20:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good for RD now, support. Natg 19 (talk) 23:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sven-Göran Eriksson

[edit]
Article: Sven-Göran Eriksson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sport
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Former England national football team manager The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 11:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support good article, I didn’t spot any CN tags or unsourced sections so I think it’s good to go. Sadsolarpanel (talk) 11:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose article has quite a few cn tags. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 16:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PrinceofPunjab: Those have been sorted now. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: